Social Penetration Theory

Name neighborly Penetration theory : Connecting Communication with Social RelationshipsCommunication and developing neighborly human relationships atomic number 18 dynamic every(prenominal)y connected to distributively former(a) because parley affects the growth of relationships while the growth of relationships affects intercourse behavior of battalion . In this regard , the genial penetration theory proposes that the tuition and deterioration of inter in-person relationships rump be achieved through the qualify of national training . As interpersonal exchanges move from footling and non- sketch in constitution , communication can be effectively achieved as it is transferred to more than intimate information exchanges through the process of bring out personal information . This is why , community are more open to communicate with family and friends and we reveal more information near our thoughts and feelings to them as compared to communicating with ordinary strangersAs we get to know a person better , people can be shellly show vital information without fear or irresolution that make us feel vulnerable . Thus , the kind penetration theory purports that the amount of interaction increases as the relationship develops and the cost-benefit considerations determine how quickly or slowly relationships develop . In a meso-level of everyday life , the Social Penetration possible action can be well exhibited . For example , slam and Jane who are complete strangers , sit beside each separate in a bus on their way to work . rooster initiates a conversation about Jane s nice red dress . Of program , Jane would not instantly react to Dick s effort for a sm on the whole tattle , so she just smiles at him . In this example , initiating a conversation is the first coif of the Social Penetration Theory where people tend to depend on first impressions , the sizing up of the other person , and attempting to take on habitualality (Pearson et al , 2003 . In another instance , Jane meets Dick again in a design . Jane realizes they have met in the lead so she agrees when Dick asks her if he could sit beside her . Before the contrive started , Dick tries to converse with Jane . Since Jane is now comfortable about Dick , she agrees to engage in small talk In this scenario , the support stage of the Social Penetration Theory - experimenting -- can be exemplified because they now agree to know more about each other . This stage includes sharing personal information at a safe level : what music , people , sports and victuals they both like or dislike . After the concert , Dick invited Jane to dinner the next night and she agreed . At dinner the next night , Jane had more opportunity to talk about her work and her life as well . This is the ternary stage of the Social Penetration Theory that is known as intensifying , as it already involves active participation , mutual concern , and an awareness that the relationship is developing because neither company has quit and both people are encouraging its maturation . The information exchanges become more personal and more intimate . So let s say Dick and Jane became so block after dating for quite some time . At this point , they have introduced each other to their families and friends . This is the fourth stage known as integrating because the two started to merge their social circles . At this stage , they may also designate common property and share interests and values . Finally , if Dick and Jane judge to take their relationship to the next level , they should eliminate all barriers that prevent them to communicate openly to each other .

This is called hold fast , the final stage of the Social Penetration Theory , where the people in the relationship commit to each other at its most intimate level . They may exchange personal items as a symbol of commitment they may enrol in a public ritual that bonds them , as in the case of marriage or they may vow to be friends for life and demonstrate that commitment by always cosmos present at important points in each other s life . Living together , marrying , having children , buying a home , or moving together to another place can be examples of bondingMy opinion about the Social Penetration Theory is that the effectiveness of communication relies greatly on people s familiarity . However , we all know that not all intimate partners can always reveal important information to the other person . For example , if Dick likes Jane to become his wife , he will have a tendency not to reveal that he had been rehabilitated because of a drug problem . This is because Dick thinks that this information might endanger his chances to marry Jane . In other lyric poem , the Social Penetration Theory only views relationship formation as a process of constructing compatible identities rather than revealing one s true self . In viewing the communication process , people tend to shift the perspective from the individualistic to the interaction between perspectives from the individual to the interaction between the parties (Svennevig 2000 ,. 21 . This is the reason why the Social Penetration Theory cannot solo assure an effective and open communication at all . However , we can learn from it because it connects the aspect of social relations to communicationWorks CitedPearson , Judy , Nelson , Paul and Titsworth , Scott . Human Communication 1st ed . untried York : The McGraw-Hill CompaniesSvennevig , Jan . Getting Acquainted in Conversation . Philadelphia : John Benjamins publishing Company , 2000Your surname (double-click to insert ) PAGE 1 ...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .