The Dangerous Source of Safe Energy

86 millisievert per year, about 0.31 of which is from the cosmic radiation.5 This is a minuscule amount. Birmingham's Professor Fremlin has estimated that "the radiation dose reliable in Britain due to the nuclear part stations reduces our median(a) life expectancy by bingle or ii seconds."6 Radiation with such minimal biological set up is obviously not going to cause significant stultification to the purlieu either. As a matter of fact, "Nuclear advocator plants, so far, are much safer (in terms of human lives lost) and little damaging to the environment than fossil fuel-burning force out plants, and they are in like manner safer than hydroelectric power plants."7

In Japan, nuclear power is a necessity, because the country has no reserves of oil, coal, or gas. Ryo Ikegame, the chief executive officer of the Tokyo Electric force out Company, stated, "We have to depend on nuclear, and this is good for the environment.

" 8 Ikegame earnestly believes his own statement, as attest by the fact that Japan plans to augment its 49 vivacious power plants with 38 more of them, a plan that is reflected in the actions of other countries also; even as long ago as 1994, there were 66 power plants under gimmick in 19 countries.9

Some critics argue that nuclear power is not entirely light-headed and safe, but as one article points out, "there are no perfectly clean electricity generation options."10 Dams "destroy habitat" and clear enormous amounts o

5. Hodgson PE. Nuclear spring Energy and the Environment. Imperial College Press; London (UK): 1999.

1. Nuclear Power Serves You [Internet], Florida Power & Light Co.; c1996-2008 [cited 2008 May 10]. Available from: http://www.fpl.com/environment/nuclear/nuclear_power_serves_you.shtml.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.