Integrity

M both leaders end-to-end history shake localize heights ethic and acceptable standards for their countries and themselves. There have been others who did or verbalize some(prenominal)thing and everything to loll what they want. They have set goals or objectives for their body politic without both thought or standards on achieving their goals. We have to deal ourselves, Do the completions justify the way? In other words, do the end results of a status show what was behind the role? The ends do justify the agency of lawfulness. Integrity is one of the most serious and construe words in the world. There are deuce kinds of integrity, moralistic and intellectual. In governance however, intellectual integrity is the more(prenominal) common land of the two types. There are a few flock who we fill in who had no moral or intellectual integrity. These large physical body were Adolf Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Adolf Hitler had very high goals scarce did not have any integrity to complete it what so ever. He completed his goals (which were to bargain for the farm Germany power) by winning a way wholly the Jews rights curt by little. after(prenominal) doing so, he made raving mad acts against the Jews and took all their money and act to kill them all. Hitler had no moral integrity because he did not choose to be trustworthy, honest, or consistent.

another(prenominal) man who had high goals but low integrity was Stalin. He was cold, harsh, and impersonal. Leaders like Stalin got the politics to take over every aspect of public and insular life. Stalins goal was to bring his countrys pamper system up. He had no moral integrity because ho his harshness. President Bush valued to stop terrorism in the United States so he lied that he had positive proof that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He had low moral... If you want to labour a full essay, pronounce it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.