They – supposedly representing the views of the common – decided that it was a good idea to replace Trident with a new nuclear chit at the cost of & beat up;20bn. £20,000,000,000 that Britain can buoy ill afford, especially when you consider what a new nuclear verification will give us in return. When we are making cuts in public services, can we really spare £20bn? A Foreign percentage report published on the 9th March would suggest the decide is no. It states “Britain cannot afford an independent nuclear deterrent. An independent system is not an option.”
To put this into context £20bn could pay for 60 new hospitals with 700 beds and full medical equipment instead of closing them. It could sanction more than 10,000 teachers into the profession to help improve education standards. It could make sure that everyone has a decent future pension or it could buy suitable body armour and military vehicles to sufficiently protect our soldiers currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Spending much(prenominal) a large amount of money on this nuclear deterrent is nothing short of scandalous.
What a surprise that the actions of this disposal – never short of controversy - are described as scandalous.
There is a growing consensus of opinion across Britain – undoubtedly encouraged by the propaganda and spin from Westminster – that the new nuclear deterrent will be an independent one that allows Britain to stand alone(predicate) as a global force. However, it does the complete opposite and simply increases our dependence on the uncontrollable hyper power across the pond. In a recent article for a national paper Chris Bellamy – a respected political analyst – wrote “the British deterrent is probably the least independent of any.”
To understand how British...If you want to defecate a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment