Science And Faith (or Something Along Those Lines)

Comp ar and Contrast : Science and trustBoth science and faith argon motivated by the quest to find domineering integrity , so both the scientist and the devout are characterized by trust of de all toldedge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to self-confidence , believing that he has final proof of what he avows to . On the other get to , the devout , when guiltless of dogma , is alert that that belief is involved , and that it is not possible for man to `know . The devout is therefore modest , as opposed to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is however only a rule of hobble . The scientist may be modest if he is aware that all knowledge is mere belief . On the other hand the devout may be arrogant if his faith takes the pee-pee of dogmaAbsolute truth is the goal of both science and faith . The scientific method is designed as to eliminate all errors is contemplation , so that knowledge derived from the observed object can be claimed as certain The scientist relies on precision of measurement and numeral s towards his goal of exactitude . Faith also seeks absolute knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is sought through and through religion . Such knowledge is without error , and so kindred to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use analogy to express what they use up to say Science uses numeric models to express its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an analogy . A orbital cavity is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as spherical it is using analogy . This is the trivial case . In fully developed scientific theories more elaborate models are used . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a illumination solar system , where the electrons orbit around the nucleus of protons and neutrons . Faith uses analogy in a more direct and obvious way .

For example Christians describe God as the forefather , and this is employing explicit analogyThe scientist , however , is not forever and a day aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . Even though he acknowledges experimental error , he believes that it is be overcome by the gradual progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more and more insignificant by the day . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is approach it , so that he becomes oblivious of the fact that analogy is be employed . On the other hand faith , when it is free of dogma , is quite conscious of the fact that analogy is cosmos used . It is aware because it knows the ways of God will always remain a arcanum to man , so that it is not possible to make absolute pronouncements on God , to any(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no mystery to existence and that native ignorance is all that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete certainty . He tends to believe that modern...If you deprivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .